Cars Lasting Longer and 40 Limit on A20

A couple of interesting news items worth covering:

Cars are aging.

Cars are lasting longer according to an article published by the Brown Car Guy (a.k.a. Shahzad Sheikh). Apparently the age of the UK car fleet is rising. The average age of cars on UK roads is now nearly 10 years which the writer concludes is a good thing. See https://browncarguy.com/2025/08/06/uk-drivers-are-keeping-their-cars-for-10-years-and-thats-a-good-thing/ . It’s an article worth reading.

I think I agree particularly as new electric vehicles cost so much. Even petrol/diesel cars last longer – I typically used to keep vehicles for 5 years but now more like 8 and with the limited mileage I do now and current health problems my current vehicle may be the last one I ever purchase.

Keeping a vehicle for 8 years, whether purchased new of second-hand, minimises the immediate loss from depreciation in the first year or two. So financially it makes sense and is better for the environment.

Legal Challenge to A20 Speeding Fines.

There have been a lot of complaints, and media coverage, about the abrupt change from a 70mph speed limit to 40mph on the A20 near Swanley. Thousands of people have been issued with fines as a result.

The limit was changed because of flooding on the A20 and was probably justified as a road safety measure following some serious accidents but the new limit was put in place without notice and poorly signed. However Chislehurst resident John Dunlop is challenging his prosecution and has defended it in Bromley Magistrates Court – a further hearing will take place in Novermber.

Comment: This was certainly an unjust prosecution that impacted many people. I advise anyone caught by this scam to persist with defending against it.

See Telegraph article here: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/08/08/tfl-speeding-driver-fights-court-case-lbc-host-iain-dale/

Roger Lawson (Twitter: https://x.com/Drivers_London )

Record Fines for 20 MPH Speeding

The Times has reported under a headline that there are “Record fines for 20mph speeding despite PM’s pledge to scrap zones”. Motorists received more than 216,000 fines for travelling between 20mph and 30mph in 2023, four times more than in 2018. London is a particular problem area. The Met alone has issued 595,000 of the fines — the equivalent of one ticket for every four cars registered in London — amid a crackdown on speeding initiated by Sadiq Khan as Mayor.

There is no correlation between lower speed limits and reduction in road casualties. So why is this campaign to lower speeds being pursued? To finance the police is one reason as they do benefit from speed awareness course fees despite denials.

But it’s also just a symptom of the general attack on the use of private vehicles by those like cyclists who would like them removed from our roads or forced to drive no faster than a cyclist.

How do we get sanity returned to our roads? Voting Mayor Khan out in May might help.

Times article: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/35635115-22b8-438e-bce5-fae72b20723d?shareToken=005028e1f6f33aa934779508d4be2bed

Roger Lawson

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

You can “follow” this blog by entering your email address in the box below.  You will then receive an email alerting you to new posts as they are added.

Contesting A20 Speed Limit Fines

There are clearly many thousands of drivers who have been caught by the drastically reduced speed limit on the A20 near Sidcup. This was reduced from 70 to 40 because of flooding when there is heavy rain which caused at least one fatal accident due to aquaplaning. The new 40 limit has been enforced with a speed camera but based on posts to a Facebook group many people were unaware of the change and have received NIPs. Sometimes several in a few days and although some are eligible for speed awareness courses, many are not and risk losing their licence.

Why don’t people go to court to contest the fines? This is an easy thing to do and you can represent yourself. Signage is clearly inadequate and easy to miss if you are joining the road from the Crittalls Corner roundabout for example.

I have in the past represented myself in magistrate courts to defend against two alleged motoring offences and won both cases. You will find magistrates are sympathetic to well argued pleas from personal individuals. Magistrates have wide discretion to dismiss cases that appear unfair or unreasonable.

If enough people defended these cases in court, then the court system would become overloaded with trivial prosecutions and the authorities would think again about these cases.

Note: ignore the fact that someone put up a false 50 speed limit sign on that stretch of road. That’s irrelevant.

There is more information on representing yourself in court here: https://www.gov.uk/represent-yourself-in-court

Roger Lawson

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

You can “follow” this blog by entering your email address in the box below.  You will then receive an email alerting you to new posts as they are added.

TfL Misleading the Public and A20 Speed Limit

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has ruled against TfL after complaints about misleading advertisements promoting the merits of expanding the ULEZ scheme in London. It said the Greater London Authority or TfL breached its rules on three occasions, including with the suggestion that “one of the most polluted places in London is inside your car”. TfL was also wrong to have said that “most air pollution related deaths actually occur in Outer London areas” and that the Ulez had resulted in “almost a halving of levels of nitrogen dioxide” in central London.

The merit or need for an expanded ULEZ has consistently been exaggerated by TfL and by Mayor Sadiq Khan, no doubt for financial reasons. There is in reality absolutely minimal health benefits from an expanded ULEZ but it is costing Londoners many millions of pounds to needlessly change their vehicles or pay penalties.

Evening Standard report:  https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/ulez-london-tfl-sadiq-khan-advertising-standards-authority-ads-b1137461.html

More analysis of the ULEZ: https://freedomfordrivers.blog/2020/04/15/ulez-the-latest-information-including-poor-financial-outcome/

This ASA ruling is a good example of how Sadiq Khan frequently misleads the public for the sake of justifying more taxes to fill his coffers or win political points.

A20 Speed Limit Fines

Meanwhile the number of drivers fined for exceeding the new speed limit on the A20 is rapidly rising. The issue has been taken up by specialist legal firm Patterson Law – see https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/a20-sidcup-south-east-london-fines-40mph-40mph-speeding-tickets-limit-b1137040.html . There is also an active Facebook group on the subject:  https://www.facebook.com/groups/1040378643884255

The BBC has also provided coverage and several politicians have taken up the issue.

See our original post on the subject, and particularly the comments thereon, for more information:  https://freedomfordrivers.blog/2023/10/01/the-war-on-the-motorist-and-new-a20-speed-limit/

In summary it’s unreasonable to prosecute people for exceeding the new speed limit when the road is dry. It’s only dangerous when there is heavy rain so specific signage to cover that was more appropriate.

Roger Lawson

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

Time to Kill Off Top Gear?

The Telegraph has reported that the BBC may axe the Top Gear show after the serious accident involving Freddie Flintoff last year. He sustained serious injuries from which he is still recovering. See article here: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/tv/2023/09/11/freddie-flintoff-top-gear-crash-bbc-crisis/

This was not the first time that reckless driving on Top Gear injured a compere with Richard Hammond seriously injured in 2006. But it is surely the case that the programme is well past its retirement date.

It was always a promoter of excess speed and risk taking with only Jeremy Clarkson offsetting that with his wit. But it surely has not been promoting responsible driving. A programme on cars and driving is worth broadcasting as cars are so essential to modern life. But it needs a new formula that discourages the boy racer mentality.

We might see fewer unreasonable attacks on cars and driving, such as 20 mph speed limits, if the programme content was refocussed.

Yes it’s time to kill off Top Gear before someone gets killed.

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

You can “follow” this blog by entering your email address in the box below.  You will then receive an email alerting you to new posts as they are added.

Speed Limits are Not Rational

After the Archbishop of Canterbury was fined for exceeding a 20 mph speed limit on London’s Embankment, we now have Home Secretary Suella Braverman admitting she broke a speed limit when Justice Secretary last summer. Is this a big deal that the media should be fawning over? I don’t think so.

It’s just another example of legislation that has turned speeding offences into a money-making scam by the offer of Speed Awareness Courses by the police.

The 20 mph limits that are spreading over most of London have not been set on any rational, scientific analysis of the benefits of speed limits and their enforcement. All that is happening is that responsible citizens are being prosecuted for trivial offences that have not harmed anyone.

But irrationally lower speed limits just add to the traffic congestion in London and degrade the road network.

Roger Lawson

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

You can “follow” this blog by entering your email address in the box below.  You will then receive an email alerting you to new posts as they are added.

Supt. Andy Cox Misleads the Public on Social Media

Police Superintendent Andy Cox has been very active on social media promoting how great a job he is doing for road safety by increasing the number of speeding tickets being issued in London.

For example a recent tweet from him said: “Incredible work by Traffic officers tackling #speeding. Last week we enforced 2,020 speeding offences across #London. By comparison it was 268 in same week in 2019. An 8 fold increase!”

What he does not say is that speed limits have been reduced in that period with a blanket 20 mph limit on all main central London roads. In addition there are more speed cameras and an expanded team of police officers using them.

Supt. Cox and others are saying that due to the lighter traffic from the coronavirus epidemic there is more speeding taking place but no evidence has been provided for that. It may be possible that some people are exceeding limits where roads are quiet and pedestrians non-existent but that hardly justifies a major police campaign. The increase in recorded speeding offences is undoubtedly mainly due to more enforcement activity.

Will it actually reduce road casualty statistics? Exceedingly unlikely because exceeding the speed limit is actually recorded as a contributory factor in only 5.9% of such accidents in London in the last five years. It’s just a witch-hunt in essence when the police would be much better to spend their resources on tackling real crimes such as knife crime which is out of control in many parts of London.

There are some extreme speeders that should be stopped because those are the ones involved in drink/drug driving or other crimes. But a lot of police enforcement of speeding is pointless. It does not cut accidents but just leads to more speeding fines being issued. And as we have pointed out before, the use of speed awareness courses now provides a powerful incentive for the police to waste resources on speeding offences because they get a cut of the income generated. It’s distorting road safety priorities.

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

You can “follow” this blog by clicking on the bottom right in most browsers or by using the Contact page to send us a message requesting. You will then receive an email alerting you to new posts as they are added.

Paranoia on Speeding Rising and Linking it to the Coronavirus Epidemic

The public’s paranoia about speeding drivers on our roads seems to be increasing. That may be partly driven by the fact that average traffic speeds have been rising as the roads are often empty due to the coronavirus epidemic. But it is also raised by politicians and even the police who are using social media to promote a false message.

For example, this was a recent exchange on twitter that I had with Councillor Nicola Dykes (she is a ward councillor in the London Borough of Bromley and also a Committee Chairman):

Posted by Nicola Dykes: SPEEDING- Police are increasing their operations to tackle this. Please contact them direct via ‪@MPSBromley to share roads where this is an issue. As ward Cllrs we have already highlighted roads we know there is an issue – Farnaby, Hayes Road, Siward etc. Please share!

Posted by me in reply: What is the accident record in those roads that justifies expending police resources on a witch-hunt?

What followed was not an answer to my question, but a long dialogue criticising my comments but never answering the question.

Unfortunately there is too much paranoia about people exceeding the speed limit with the result that a large amount of effort is being expended by the police and others on stopping it when that effort is very unlikely to result in any reduction in road casualties.

As anyone who has looked into this issue would know, the number of road accidents where speeding (i.e. exceeding the speed limit) is a factor is very low. In London the data makes it plain that exceeding the speed limit (factor 306 on the police STATS19 reporting forms) is a very minor factor in KSIs (Killed and Serious Injuries). It’s actually recorded as a contributory factor in only 5.9% of such accidents in the last five years.

The largest contributory factor by far is “Failed to Look Properly” which accounted for 42% of KSIs in London or 35% nationally. But there are several other factors with higher ratings than “Exceeding the Speed Limit” such as “Poor Turn or Manoeuvre”, “Failed to Judge Other Persons Path…”, “Loss of Control” and “Careless, Reckless or in a Hurry”.

Bearing in mind that multiple factors can be recorded, and that many of those involved in accidents will be under the influence of drink or drugs, or otherwise be involved in criminal activity (e.g. in stolen cars), even if the speed limit was rigorously enforced it would be unlikely to make much difference to road casualty statistics.

That is why I say that the whole policy of more speed enforcement is driven by paranoia and is actually diverting resources from more productive and effective road safety policies – such as improving roads, improving driver education and other possible approaches.

As regards the possible problem of excessive speed in Farnaby Road, Hayes Road (the B2212) and Siward Road before the police or Bromley Council spends money on tackling that alleged problem it is best to obtain some data on the actual speed of traffic in those roads and the accident record – the latter should already be available.

I have therefore requested under the Freedom of Information Act the following information:

  1. The details of all road accidents in the following roads: Farnaby Road, Hayes Road and Siward Road for the last three years that are available. That should include not just the totals but the details of accidents in those roads as reported on STATS19 forms (but excluding personal information of course).
  2. Any information held by Bromley Council on the speeds of traffic in those roads.

One of the persons who has been very active on social media promoting the hysteria over speeding is Superintendent Andy Cox of the Metropolitan Police. One of his recent tweets said: “With some very high speeds in London increasing risk of fatal and serious crashes which would add pressure to the NHS, Police, Fire causing potential impact on Covid-19 patients”.

This suggestion that accidents are increasing, putting pressure on the NHS is unsupported by any facts. In reality NHS A&E facilities have fewer patients and plenty of spare capacity at present and the suggestion that treating accident patients might affect treatment of Covid-19 patients is simply wrong. It’s too early to obtain the actual data on vehicle accidents but insurance companies such as Admiral are already refunding part of their car insurance premiums because the number of car accidents has fallen.

We are also seeing the same biased and inaccurate messages from those campaigning for 20 mph speed limits where they suggest that imposing them would relieve pressure on the NHS. It’s simply nonsense.

Readers should make sure they oppose this frenzy of fake news by responding to it with the facts.

Roger Lawson

Postscript: The results of the FOI Act request for data on roads in Bromley can be summarised as follows. It does not provide all the information I requested but there are some conclusions that can be drawn from it.

  1. Recent traffic speed data is only available for Farnaby Road but it shows average traffic speed is well below 30 mph, at about 26 mph. The 85th percentile figure also suggests this road is best signposted at 30 mph. There is some research available that shows that setting the speed limit at the 85th percentile of traffic speed actually results in the minimum of road accidents.
  2. The accident records for the last 5 years from Crashmap shows a few slight accidents in Farnaby Road, one serious accident in Hayes Road and only one slight accident in Siward Road. There were no fatalities. These are not exceptional figures for any roads in Bromley. Slight accidents can be quite trivial but it might be worth looking at the details of the serious accident in Hayes Road to see what the cause of that was.
  3. If local residents are concerned about the speed of traffic in Hayes Road or Siward Road, I suggest that council officers be asked to undertake some speed monitoring on those roads.

Speeding is often a subjective matter, reported by some people but not considered a problem by others. Whether there is a problem, or one worth expending resources upon, is best judged by looking at the accident data. The roads mentioned are obviously not ones that should take priority for road safety measures in Bromley as there are many other roads with a worse accident record. That is where money should be spent – not on roads where there is simply a vociferous group of residents.

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

You can “follow” this blog by clicking on the bottom right in most browsers or by using the Contact page to send us a message requesting. You will then receive an email alerting you to new posts as they are added.