How Planning and Environmental Regulations Thwart Key Transport Schemes

The Daily Telegraph ran an interesting article this week on how Chris Todd uses “lawfare” to challenge road building schemes. His activities have cost several hundreds of millions of pounds and caused numerous delays while generally being unable to ultimately thwart most developments.

How can he afford such challenges? Mainly because the UK is a party to the Aarhus Convention which limits the costs that can be incurred on challenges based on environmental issues. This limits an individual’s legal costs to £5,000 while the Government can run up legal costs of many times that amount in defending trivial challenges.

The Telegraph article is a good summary of examples where needless delays and costs have been incurred. See https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/04/09/chris-todd-britains-costliest-nimby/

The regulations need reform and we need to withdraw from the Aarhus Convention to stop pointless and expensive legal challenges.

Roger Lawson (Twitter: https://x.com/Drivers_London )

You can obtain notifications of new posts in future by following me on Twitter (now “X”) – see https://x.com/Drivers_London where new posts are usually mentioned.

London Plan – Comments Submitted

We made some initial comments on the “London Plan” in December. That is a document that spells out how Mayor Sadiq Khan intends to plan your life – at least so far as residents of London are concerned or those who have to use the transport system in the capital.

What’s the London Plan? It’s a document that sets the “spatial development” strategy for London over the next few years and has legal implications for planning developments, housing construction, transport infrastructure, and many other aspects of our lives.

The London Plan spells out how he intends to enforce “modal shift”, i.e. force you to use public transport or walk/cycle and ensure you take more exercise to improve your health. He intends to turn roads whose essential purpose is the movement of goods and people into places for “social interaction”.

Cars and other private transport modes will be discouraged by such means as reducing parking provision to zero, thus forcing us back into the Victorian era if not further.

He wants to fix his budget problems arising from financial incompetence and promises he made to get elected, now called a “funding gap”, by raising taxes including taking control of Vehicle Excise Duty (VED).

Some of this is covered in the Mayor’s Transport Strategy of course which we have encouraged people to respond to. But the important point is that unlike that where the Mayor will decide on the outcome, the London Plan is the subject of an inquiry led by a Planning Inspector, i.e. it’s an independent review.

Roger Lawson

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

You can “follow” this blog by clicking on the bottom right.