Assisted Dying and Transport News 

I was very pleased to see the Assisted Dying Bill passed in the House of Commons. I have supported the Dignity in Dying organisation (formerly VES) and their campaigns for over 30 years  – see https://www.dignityindying.org.uk/  . When I want to leave this world I want to go quickly and without judges or doctors interfering in my decision, or the necessity to go to Switzerland. 

I don’t want to live to 100 as my mother did. 85 years is long enough for anyone to complete their life’s ambitions as quality of life declines rapidly thereafter. I am ready to go anytime now but the Assisted Dying Bill might frustrate that ambition. There is no need for anyone to die in pain. The Assisted Dying Bill may not be perfect as it stands but there is plenty of time to improve it.

Opposition to the Bill is irrational and based on lack of knowledge of how such legislation works, and well, in other countries.

New Transport Secretary

The other big political news was the resignation of Louise Haigh as Transport Secretary. This arose because she had failed to disclose a past conviction for fraud over the loss of a mobile phone. This seems to have arisen because of a simple mistake and subsequent bad legal advice where she plead guilty.

Her replacement as Transport Secretary is Heidi Alexander, who previously served as Deputy Mayor for Transport in London. During her tenure, from 2018 to 2021, she oversaw the introduction and expansion of the ULEZ scheme, which was unnecessary, and the rollout of 20mph speed limits in London. TfL became a financial basket case during her tenancy. She may have a malign influence on national transport policy. In 2019, she candidly confessed, “I may not have qualifications in transport.” A frank admission given her track record in the role but it is convention to appoint people with no knowledge or experience of the subject to senior government positions. It’s traditional in the UK that amateurs are thought to be better than professionals to take responsibility for major policy and associated budgets. That’s a very silly approach.

Before she left Louise Haigh announced a new National Transport Strategy  – see  https://www.gov.uk/government/news/transport-secretary-unveils-her-vision-for-integrated-transport-across-england  . It included a commitment to a ‘people first approach’ to getting people around the country. Recognising that different passengers have different needs, and the quality of transport varies across the country, it will set out how government can support local areas to make all forms of transport work together better. All this is political bullshit in essence which we have seen many times before to no great effect.

It is still unclear what diesel/petrol or hybrid vehicles will be allowed to be sold after 2030, although the media have reported that the Government is having a rethink and is consulting car manufacturers. But it is obvious that UK car and van manufacturing is already facing a cliff edge. Stellantis last week announced it was closing van manufacturing in Luton. Jaguar is suspending production of all cars because their product range is now all-electric and there is simply insufficient demand for such cars.

The requirement for all vehicle manufacturers to have a certain proportion of sales from all-electric vehicles is proving impossible to meet economically. One can see that many people will be keeping petrol vehicles for as long as 20 years so will frustrate this Government policy. Old cars could become quite valuable!

Roger Lawson

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

Fuelmii, Shell Legal Win, Freedom of Speech and Jaguar Ceasing Car Production

A new service that was recently promoted to me, as a disabled driver but anyone can use it, is Fuelmii. This company will refuel your vehicle at home so there is no need to take it to a petrol station. This can help people like me with limited mobility and who might soon have difficulty filling my own vehicle.

They appear to have been providing the service to commercial vehicle users for some time but have now extended it to private car users in London. I have not yet tried the service but I may soon do so. See https://up.fuelmii.com/

The good news for Shell shareholders is that the company has won an appeal in the Hague against an order to slash its greenhouse gas emissions. This was a case brought by Friends of the Earth and others which may have severely damaged Shell and set a very bad precedent for other oil companies. Trying to stop the use of oil and gas is simply irrational. We will need those products for many years into the future as there is no viable alternative for some applications.

The world is becoming less and less rational. Recent legal cases in the UK where people are being accused of “Non Crime Hate Incidents” and hence get a criminal record – see the Alison Pearson case for example – are truly irrational. Free speech is being lost to a world where the prejudice of the thought police is becoming paramount. I agree with Elon Musk. The UK is losing free speech and you could end up with legal prejudice because you dare to express an opinion on Twitter (“X”) or Facebook on any matter under the sun. We need a new “Bill of Rights” to stop all of this nonsense.

I recently purchased a second-hand Jaguar XE (petrol fueled) which I plan to keep for many years. I normally keep vehicles for 8 to 10 years as that is the most economical way of owning and running cars. I don’t want the production of oil and gasoline to cease. Electric vehicles can be more expensive to buy, insure and run so I am not yet convinced it is time to change to an electric vehicle.

Unfortunately Jaguar have recently made their new product line all electric with large and expensive SUVs. These are not the kinds of vehicles I like to buy. Indeed they seem to have suspended production of all cars for the present.

I feel sad about the way Jaguar has declined of late. I have owned several Jaguars since 1964 when I was a university student and owned a Mk.9 – an enormous luxury saloon – see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaguar_Mark_IX. I would not want you to get the impression I was a wealthy student – It was very cheap to buy but too expensive to run so I sold it quickly.  I also later owned several XJ saloon models and the last version of the XJS and XF. The XF in diesel form was a reliable and comfortable saloon but needed updating of late with a hybrid model. The XE model is economical and fast enough (a 2 litre petrol engine) but has a smallish boot. It was also not promoted much so hence the small sales no doubt.

The current Jaguar line-up is not attractive to my mind. Jaguars need to be high-performance, good all-rounders, very comfortable but low cost in comparison with other luxury cars.

Roger Lawson

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

Book Review – Scared to Death   

One of the books I have been reading lately is “Scared to Death” by Christopher Booker and Richard North. First published some years ago but more recently updated it covers the public scares from BSE to Global Warming including speeding on our roads and why scares are costing us the earth.

To quote from the Introduction: “In the past twenty years, Western society in general and Britain in particular has been in the grip of a remarkable and very dangerous psychological phenomenon. Again and again since the 1980s we have seen the rise of some great fear, centred on a mysterious new threat to human health and wellbeing. As a result, we are told, large numbers of people will suffer or die. Salmonella in eggs; listeria in cheese; BSE in beef; dioxins in poultry; the ‘Millennium Bug’;DDT; nitrate in water; vitamin B6; ‘Satanic’ child abuse; lead in petrol and computers; passive smoking; asbestos; SARS; Asian bird flu – the list is seemingly endless.

Indeed, we are currently in the grip of the greatest such fear of all: that of a warming of the world’s climate which, we are officially told, could well put an end to much of civilized life as we know it. The price we have paid for such panics has been immense; most notably the colossal financial costs arising from the means society has chosen to defend itself from these threats. Yet, again and again, we have seen how it eventually emerged that the fear was largely or wholly misplaced. The threat of disaster came to be seen as having been no more than what we call a ‘scare’”.

The book certainly covers the ground well and shows how these scares arise and are promoted by the ignorant. Popular media and even the supposedly responsible press love a “bad news” story that helps their circulation (or their on-line media “hits” that helps their advertising income).

But the financial cost to the public can be enormous with no cost/benefit justification for the chosen solutions to the perceived problems. Indeed in the case of road safety the chosen measures (speed cameras) have not only been financially damaging but have diverted funds from effective road safety measures and meant that the UK no longer has a lead in reducing accidents and deaths (KSIs).

Some of the scares, such as that for AIDS, did turn into a serious problem only the worst outcomes being averted by advances in medical science and simple contrary public health measures. But other scares just disappeared because they turned out to be unreal – such as the Millenium Computer bug. However many millions of dollars and pounds were spent on curing imaginary problems.

One issue I was personally involved with was the “speed kills” issue which has resulted in the proliferation of speed cameras and speed humps. It is covered in Chapter 10 of the book.

As the book says, during the early years of the last century the death rate from road accidents in the UK consistently fell. By 1993 it was below 4,000. Britain’s roads were the safest in Europe. In France and Germany, the annual death toll was over 9,000. In Portugal the death rate was well over three times as high. Then the rate of decline suddenly slowed. Over the next decade the total fall was smaller than in any of the years between 1990 and 1993. On five occasions the yearly figure actually rose. So what had changed? Road safety policy as promoted by the Government changed.

The book says: “Undoubtedly one important factor in the steady fall in the fatal accident rate in earlier decades, despite a doubling in the number of vehicles on Britain’s roads – from 12 million in 1966 to 25 million in 1994 – had been the technical advances that made vehicles themselves much safer. But this could not have explained the slowing in the fall of accidents in the 1990s, when new regulations had made vehicles safer still”.

In reality the automated speed enforcement and reduction in speed limits created a financial incentive for the police to invest in speed cameras, speed awareness courses and enforcement when they had very little impact on road casualties. Over 2 million people are now issued with speeding fines every year in the UK at enormous cost to themselves and a whole industry has been created to support this mistaken policy due to the scare that “speed kills” when excessive speed is one of the less common factors in the cause of road accidents.

Expenditure on road policing and other effective measures to reduce accidents such as local road engineering were reduced in favour of more enforcement by cameras in the hope that would cut accidents when it did not.

See this web page for some of the articles I have written on this subject: https://www.freedomfordrivers.org/road-safety

As regards the book “Scared to Death” although the authors have documented well how such scares arise and are promoted by the misinformed they unfortunately have not tackled the issue of how to stop us wasting money on false solutions. But the book should be essential reading for all politicians.

Roger Lawson

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

Drivers Still Refusing to Pay ULEZ

According to a report in Kent Online most drivers in Kent receiving fines for non-payment of the ULEZ in London are still refusing to pay. Meanwhile Sadiq Khan is chasing up more non-payers by using bailiffs to do so. Total of outstanding fines is £370 million and 1,400 vehicles have so far been seized for repeated non-payment. How much is that costing? That’s not been disclosed but it could be very expensive as avoiding bailiffs is not difficult. One issue is that those resident in Kent don’t get a vote on who is Mayor so it’s taxation without representation.

It just demonstrates the anger with which motorists view the ULEZ system which has not made any significant improvement in air quality and is just viewed as a tax raising system.

Another TfL budget problem is that Transport for London may be required to refund millions of pounds in fines issued to Dutch lorry drivers for Ultra Low Emission Zone and LEZ  violations. They were issued fines unlawfully – see https://www.gbnews.com/lifestyle/cars/tfl-pay-millions-wrongly-issued-ulez-fines-dutch

These events just demonstrate how incompetent TfL is and that making fines stick on people who don’t agree with a policy is not easy.

We need TfL to be taken out of the control of the Mayor of London who acts as a dictator and can ignore public opinion.

Roger Lawson

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

You can “follow” this blog by entering your email address in the box below.  You will then receive an email alerting you to new posts as they are added.

Tesla Announces Robo Taxis – a Revolution is Coming

Elon Musk has promoted a new Tesla “Cybercab” model – basically an electric car with no pedals, steering wheel or other controls which he hopes to sell for $30,000. He also unveiled a prototype for a 20-person autonomous vehicle called a Robovan. They have yet to be approved by regulators and currently rely mainly on vision systems to avoid collisions unlike some of the self-driving competitors. He also demonstrated an Optimus humanoid robot for jobs around the house.

Production of the Cybercab is not scheduled until 2026 so this is more a statement of ambition than short-term reality but it does show that Tesla are committed to revolutionising personal transport. See https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/news/2024/10/11/elon-musk-unveils-new-tesla-robotaxi-cybercab/

Meanwhile Tesla is facing stronger competition for electric cars from low-cost Chinese manufacturers. One can easily envisage that the world will be a very different place as regards automobiles in a few years’ time. Electric cars are achieving longer ranges and are getting relatively cheaper so are becoming more practical for most people who only do daily short journey commutes.

My next personal vehicle may well be an electric one, and being able to give up driving altogether would also be a distinct advantage as I get older.

Roger Lawson

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

You can “follow” this blog by entering your email address in the box below.  You will then receive an email alerting you to new posts as they are added.

Just Stop Oil Ignores Sentence for Criminal Damage

In July two Just Stop Oil activists, Anna Holland and Phobe Plummer were found guilty of criminal damage after throwing tomato soup over a painting of sunflowers by Van Gogh. They were subsequently sentenced to prison but soon after the stupidity was repeated by three more people from the same organisation – see https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c243v5m0r0lo

Comment: How will damaging art support their cause? It won’t. It’s just an attempt to gain publicity. And their cause is extremely doubtful anyway. Stopping oil and gas production would be extremely damaging to the economy and is likely to create more premature deaths from undermining agriculture and fertilizer production. The idiots who are promoting the Stop Oil campaign have simply not studied the science.

Roger Lawson

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

You can “follow” this blog by entering your email address in the box below.  You will then receive an email alerting you to new posts as they are added.

Should Cyclists Have Insurance and Legal Challenge to Lambeth LTN

Should cyclists have insurance? This is a topic that the Times Newspaper have published an article on. Below are my comments on the subject:

I would suggest that not only are they wise to have it but they should be legally obliged to do so. Cyclists can easily damage the vehicles of other road users but they can also impose a large financial burden on the NHS from their own carelessness by simply falling off.

Cyclists often just ride off after accidents and compulsory insurance would encourage them to stop and report collisions which is a condition of most insurance cover. 

Cycling is becoming more dangerous, particularly to others, as cycling speeds have risen. Lightweight bikes and electric ones have made the situation a lot worse in recent years and heavy cargo bikes are particularly a risk for pedestrians. The problems are compounded by the recent encouragement by councils of more cycling which means we get inexperienced cyclists commuting at speed in our major cities, often racing against their own times recorded on Strava.

The number of fatal accidents to pedestrians from collisions with cyclists are relatively few but they are regularly reported. In London alone there were 31 “serious” injuries to pedestrians involving cyclists in 2016 (Injuries classified as “Serious” are far from trivial and typically require hospital treatment).

Forcing cyclists to have insurance might just focus their minds on riding with more care, paying attention to other road users and not ignoring road signs, traffic lights and pedestrian crossings as they often do at present.

Even minor collisions between cyclists and cars can cause significant damage to paintwork and incur major expense in repairs. The advantage of requiring compulsory insurance is that it avoids the need to assign blame which is often a difficult thing to do.

So my answer to the question of whether cyclists should have insurance is an unequivocal “Yes”.

Lambeth LTN

A group are mounting a legal challenge to a Low Traffic Neighbourhood (LTN) proposed in the London Borough of Lambeth. They are raising funds to do so on Gofundme – see https://www.gofundme.com/f/legal-costs-to-force-a-reevaluation-of-the-west-dulwich-ltn

LTNs are always worthy of a challenge as they make little difference in practice to overall traffic levels and typically are supported by people who just wish to move traffic elsewhere.

Roger Lawson

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

You can “follow” this blog by entering your email address in the box below.  You will then receive an email alerting you to new posts as they are added.

New TfL Board Members

Sadiq Khan has appointed several new board members to the Transport for London (TfL) board, which he chairs. These are not the kind of people who are likely to tackle the financial problems of TfL or stop the gesture politics that is so favoured by Khan.

Where are the candidates with experience of running a large transport system? Where are the representatives of those using private cars, or commercial vehicles on business, or even bus users? But of course we do have a representative of the TUC to support the workers.

These are just likely to be a bunch of people who will approve the financial recklessness embodied in the Mayor’s Transport Policy and which has not improved road safety because misguided policies such as 20 mph speed limits are promoted.  

Roger Lawson

TfL Press Release: https://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-appoints-new-members-refreshed-tfl-board

 Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

You can “follow” this blog by entering your email address in the box below.  You will then receive an email alerting you to new posts as they are added.

New Transport Secretary Has Delusions

The new Transport Secretary, Louise Haigh, has said the Labour Government will invest “unprecedented levels of funding” in cycling and walking as a way to improve health and inequality. She apparently thinks this could cut GP appointments “by hundreds of thousands, if not millions a year”. This is delusional.

The general population is fitter than it has been for a long time with increases in cycling and other forms of exercise. But the number of GP appointments and demand for medical services is rising. Why? Because the population is ageing, a minority of people are too fat because of addiction to junk food and people also have higher expectations of the NHS.

She also said: ““We’re in a climate crisis. We’re in a public health crisis; getting people walking and cycling and moving more are essential to solving both of those in the immediate term and in the long term”.

She is also quoted in the Independent as saying “Ms Haigh dubbed the last government’s approach to 20mph speed limits, cycle lanes and Low Traffic Neighbourhoods “ridiculous” after it launched criticism of so-called “anti-motorist” policies. She apparently does not want central Government interfering in what should be local decisions. But we’ll surely end up with lunatic schemes as we have seen in Wales, in several London boroughs and in the policies of TfL and Sadiq Khan. For example, this comes despite a recent YouGov survey indicating that 70 per cent of people in Wales – which last year imposed a 20mph speed limit in built up areas – opposed the policy. Meanwhile, 40 per cent admitted to regularly breaking it.

I suggest Ms Haigh needs to reconsider but this is the kind of dogma we see from socialist politicians who think they know better than the public and like to impose their views on others. Labour is rapidly losing popularity since the General Election and this is the kind of reason why. Practical considerations and scientific evidence are ignored – for example 20 mph limits have not improved road safety figures.

Throwing money at new cycle lanes will not solve the underlying health problems of a minority of the population and claims about tackling a “climate crisis” are simply ludicrous. But is seems the war on the motorist is going to be escalated.  

Roger Lawson

Guardian article: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/aug/20/labour-investment-cycling-walking-unprecedented-louise-haigh

Independent article: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/20mph-speed-limits-louise-haigh-b2599608.html

BBC Article: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9v8d4lvjryo

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drivers_London

You can “follow” this blog by entering your email address in the box below.  You will then receive an email alerting you to new posts as they are added.

London Mayor’s Transport Strategy Still Failing

Transport for London (TfL) have published their latest report on transport in London. It claims some success on achieving the goals of Sadiq Khan’s London Transport Strategy but in reality the goal of achieving more “active travel” is simply not being met.

Walking mode share actually fell in 2023 to 26% and although public transport share rose this is a combination of recovery after the covid epidemic as well as throwing money at subsidising buses and London underground where people do not pay economic fares.

See chart below from the report – the full report is obtainable from the link below.

Meanwhile the Mayor has said he is not safe as a “Muslim politician”. It is certainly the case that he is widely hated but I suggest this is not because of his religion but because of his economic policies including raising taxes such as the ULEZ scheme and attacks on private motorists.

The Mayor’s comments just help to increase division and he should leave religion out of politics.

The cover of the new report is shown above and it’s worth noting that it shows someone walking across the road while looking at her phone.  Not a safe practice! She should have been shown using a pedestrian crossing and not using her phone at the same time.

Roger Lawson

TfL Report: https://board.tfl.gov.uk/documents/s22848/Appendix%201%20Delivering%20the%20Mayors%20Transport%20Strategy%20202324%20-%20Draft%20July%202024.pdf